If a new task force has its way, time-honored extra duties such as handing out towels at the gym, raking sand, standing gate guard duty and picking up litter will no longer consume the time and energy of infantry soldiers and Marines.
Instead, they will be better selected, equipped, trained and prepared for their mission — intimate killing in close combat.
A close combat lethality task force operating at the highest levels of the Pentagon is likely shaping not only the future of the infantry but also who serves in ground combat forces, when and for how long, and what they do while they’re serving.
Robert Wilkie, the undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, and retired Army Maj. Gen. Robert Scales on Wednesday unveiled some of the early work being done on a task force that was years in the making but only under Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis has received the heft of funding and resolve to get moving.
Wilkie and Scales spoke Wednesday at the Association of the U.S. Army’s headquarters in Arlington, Virginia.
The Close Combat Lethality Task Force is a cross-service group that formed earlier this year to focus on increasing the lethality of infantry and certain close combat troops with the goal of overmatch in the close, tactical fight.
Using findings from a Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation, or CAPE, study last year, the task force, at Mattis’ direction, has already put $2.5 billion toward materiel and equipment improvements for the infantry, such as the Next Generation Combat Weapon being developed by the Army.
Scales serves as the chair of the task force. His 2016 book, “Scales on War: The Future of America’s Military at Risk,” serves as a kind of blueprint or potential road map for changes he sees necessary to the survivability and success of infantry and special operations forces in the Army, Marines and Special Operations Command.
“The secretary of defense has dedicated a great deal of time and effort,” Wilkie said. “He has tasked us with gauging the readiness of the entire force, enforcing decisions, making changes in force structure. We’re no longer just an oversight bot.”
His office is reconfiguring how small units, platoons and below, are accounting for their time, Wilkie said.
“The readiness reporting system at the small unit level fails us,” Scales said.
Wilkie said that one of Mattis’ main points of frustration is wasting the time of soldiers and Marines.
To that end, they have directed the services to drastically reduce the annual mandatory training requirements to claw back time for training to warfighting goals.
Infantry soldiers and Marines will be training for their jobs, be it in the field, on the range or in a virtual environment through the myriad of simulations being developed by both the Army and Marines.
Wilkie said his office is building a “rational workforce management” model that will closely evaluate every aspect of how the close combat forces across the branches are being utilized.
That will include how they are selected and when they retire.
He said that the 20-year “up or out” portion of the outdated personnel system will be looked at.
When asked after the event whether Scales’ suggestion that close combat leaders are in their prime at ages 28 to 40, and that they should first serve in other jobs before joining the infantry, Wilkie agreed that the recommendation, along with many others, is “on the table.”